Start implementing constructors/matches

as per Implementing Functional Programming Languages by Peyton-Jones
This commit is contained in:
greg 2018-08-05 14:23:08 -07:00
parent 42d0aba21c
commit c637a922a9
1 changed files with 25 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ pub enum Expr {
Tuple(Vec<Expr>), Tuple(Vec<Expr>),
Func(Func), Func(Func),
Val(Rc<String>), Val(Rc<String>),
NewConstructor {
type_name: Rc<String>,
tag: usize,
arg: Box<Expression>,
},
Constructor { Constructor {
name: Rc<String>, name: Rc<String>,
}, },
@ -47,11 +52,18 @@ pub enum Expr {
}, },
Match { Match {
cond: Box<Expr>, cond: Box<Expr>,
arms: Vec<(Pattern, Vec<Stmt>)> alternatives: Vec<Alternative>
}, },
UnimplementedSigilValue UnimplementedSigilValue
} }
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct Alternative {
tag: usize,
bound_vars: (),
item: Vec<Stmt>,
}
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] #[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub enum Lit { pub enum Lit {
Nat(u64), Nat(u64),
@ -142,11 +154,19 @@ fn reduce_if_expression(discriminator: &Discriminator, body: &IfExpressionBody,
None => vec![], None => vec![],
Some(stmts) => stmts.iter().map(|expr| expr.reduce(symbol_table)).collect(), Some(stmts) => stmts.iter().map(|expr| expr.reduce(symbol_table)).collect(),
}; };
Expr::Match { Expr::Match { //TODO this still doesn't work right
cond, cond,
arms: vec![ alternatives: vec![
(pat.clone(), then_clause), Alternative {
(Pattern::Ignored, else_clause) tag: 0,
bound_vars: (),
item: then_clause,
},
Alternative {
tag: 1,
bound_vars: (),
item: else_clause,
},
], ],
} }
}, },