Accessors

For name.value lookups

schala-lang/language/src/ast/mod.rs

@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ pub enum ExpressionKind {
     WhileExpression { condition: Option<Box<Expression>>, body: Block },
     ForExpression { enumerators: Vec<Enumerator>, body: Box<ForBody> },
     Lambda { params: Vec<FormalParam>, type_anno: Option<TypeIdentifier>, body: Block },
+    Access { name: Rc<String>, expr: Box<Expression> },
     ListLiteral(Vec<Expression>),
 }
 

schala-lang/language/src/ast/visitor.rs

@@ -128,6 +128,9 @@ pub fn walk_expression<V: ASTVisitor>(v: &mut V, expr: &Expression) {
             Lambda { params: _, type_anno: _, body } => {
                 walk_block(v, body);
             }
+            Access { name: _, expr } => {
+                walk_expression(v, expr);
+            }
             ListLiteral(exprs) =>
                 for expr in exprs {
                     walk_expression(v, expr);

schala-lang/language/src/ast/visualize.rs

@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ fn render_expression(expr: &Expression, indent: usize, buf: &mut String) {
             newline(buf);
             do_indent(indent, buf);
         }
+        Access { .. } => buf.push_str("<access-expr>"),
         ListLiteral(..) => buf.push_str("<list-literal>"),
     }
     buf.push(')');

schala-lang/language/src/parsing/new_tests.rs

@@ -203,11 +203,36 @@ fn operators() {
 
 #[test]
 fn accessors() {
-    /*
-    assert_expr!("a.b");
-    assert_expr!("a.b.c.d()");
-    assert_expr!("a.b().c.d()");
-    */
+    use ExpressionKind::*;
+
+    assert_expr!("a.b", expr(Access { name: rc("b"), expr: bx(expr(Value(qn!(a)))) }));
+    assert_expr!(
+        "a.b.c",
+        expr(Access {
+            name: rc("c"),
+            expr: bx(expr(Access { name: rc("b"), expr: bx(expr(Value(qn!(a)))) }))
+        })
+    );
+    assert_expr!(
+        "a.b.c(3)",
+        expr(Call {
+            f: bx(expr(Access {
+                name: rc("c"),
+                expr: bx(expr(Access { name: rc("b"), expr: bx(expr(Value(qn!(a)))) }))
+            })),
+            arguments: vec![InvocationArgument::Positional(expr(NatLiteral(3)))],
+        })
+    );
+    assert_expr!(
+        "a.b().c",
+        expr(Access {
+            name: rc("c"),
+            expr: bx(expr(Call {
+                f: bx(expr(Access { name: rc("b"), expr: bx(expr(Value(qn!(a)))) })),
+                arguments: vec![]
+            }))
+        })
+    );
 }
 
 #[test]

schala-lang/language/src/reduced_ir/mod.rs

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ use crate::{
     ast,
     builtin::Builtin,
     symbol_table::{DefId, SymbolSpec, SymbolTable},
-    type_inference::TypeContext,
+    type_inference::{TypeContext, TypeId},
 };
 
 mod test;
@@ -135,23 +135,14 @@ impl<'a, 'b> Reducer<'a, 'b> {
             }),
             NamedStruct { name, fields } => {
                 self.symbol_table.debug();
+                println!("Namedstruct name {} id: {}", name, name.id);
                 let symbol = self.symbol_table.lookup_symbol(&name.id).unwrap();
                 let (tag, type_id) = match symbol.spec() {
                     SymbolSpec::RecordConstructor { tag, members: _, type_id } => (tag, type_id),
                     e => return Expression::ReductionError(format!("Bad symbol for NamedStruct: {:?}", e)),
                 };
 
-                // Eventually, the ReducedIR should decide what field ordering is optimal.
-                // For now, just do it alphabetically.
-                let mut field_order: Vec<String> = self
-                    .type_context
-                    .lookup_record_members(&type_id, tag)
-                    .unwrap()
-                    .iter()
-                    .map(|(field, _type_id)| field)
-                    .cloned()
-                    .collect();
-                field_order.sort_unstable();
+                let field_order = compute_field_orderings(&self.type_context, &type_id, tag).unwrap();
 
                 let mut field_map = HashMap::new();
                 for (name, expr) in fields.iter() {
@@ -179,6 +170,8 @@ impl<'a, 'b> Reducer<'a, 'b> {
             WhileExpression { .. } => Expression::ReductionError("While expr not implemented".to_string()),
             ForExpression { .. } => Expression::ReductionError("For expr not implemented".to_string()),
             ListLiteral { .. } => Expression::ReductionError("ListLiteral expr not implemented".to_string()),
+            Access { name, expr } =>
+                Expression::Access { name: name.as_ref().to_string(), expr: Box::new(self.expression(expr)) },
         }
     }
 
@@ -388,3 +381,21 @@ impl ast::Pattern {
         })
     }
 }
+
+/// Given the type context and a variant, compute what order the fields on it were stored.
+/// This needs to be public until type-checking is fully implemented because the type information
+/// is only available at runtime.
+pub fn compute_field_orderings(
+    type_context: &TypeContext,
+    type_id: &TypeId,
+    tag: u32,
+) -> Option<Vec<String>> {
+    // Eventually, the ReducedIR should decide what field ordering is optimal.
+    // For now, just do it alphabetically.
+
+    let record_members = type_context.lookup_record_members(type_id, tag)?;
+    let mut field_order: Vec<String> =
+        record_members.iter().map(|(field, _type_id)| field).cloned().collect();
+    field_order.sort_unstable();
+    Some(field_order)
+}

schala-lang/language/src/reduced_ir/types.rs

@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ pub enum Expression {
     Tuple(Vec<Expression>),
     Lookup(Lookup),
     Assign { lval: DefId, rval: Box<Expression> },
+    Access { name: String, expr: Box<Expression> },
     Callable(Callable),
     Call { f: Box<Expression>, args: Vec<Expression> },
     Conditional { cond: Box<Expression>, then_clause: Vec<Statement>, else_clause: Vec<Statement> },

schala-lang/language/src/tree_walk_eval/evaluator.rs

@@ -126,6 +126,28 @@ impl<'a, 'b> Evaluator<'a, 'b> {
             Expression::CaseMatch { box cond, alternatives } =>
                 self.case_match_expression(cond, alternatives)?,
             Expression::ReductionError(e) => return Err(e.into()),
+            Expression::Access { name, box expr } => {
+                let expr = self.expression(expr)?;
+                match expr {
+                    Primitive::Object { items, ordered_fields: Some(ordered_fields), .. } => {
+                        let idx = match ordered_fields.iter().position(|s| s == &name) {
+                            Some(idx) => idx,
+                            None => return Err(format!("Field `{}` not found", name).into()),
+                        };
+
+                        let item = match items.get(idx) {
+                            Some(item) => item,
+                            None => return Err(format!("Field lookup `{}` failed", name).into()),
+                        };
+
+                        item.clone()
+                    }
+                    e =>
+                        return Err(
+                            format!("Trying to do a field lookup on a non-object value: {:?}", e).into()
+                        ),
+                }
+            }
         })
     }
 

schala-lang/language/src/tree_walk_eval/test.rs

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 #![cfg(test)]
-use test_case::test_case;
 use pretty_assertions::assert_eq;
+use test_case::test_case;
 
 use crate::{
     symbol_table::SymbolTable,
@@ -367,3 +367,14 @@ import Option::*
 let x = Some(9); if x is Some(q) then { q } else { 0 }"#;
     eval_assert(source, "9");
 }
+
+#[test]
+fn accessors() {
+    let source = r#"
+type Klewos = Klewos { a: Int, b: String }
+let value = Klewos::Klewos { a: 50, b: "nah" }
+(value.a, value.b)
+    "#;
+
+    eval_assert(source, r#"(50, "nah")"#);
+}