Finally figured out unified condition syntax

This commit is contained in:
greg 2018-06-18 23:26:02 -07:00
parent 2d052d34f7
commit ba319a7bc3
1 changed files with 15 additions and 2 deletions

17
TODO.md
View File

@ -24,9 +24,22 @@ pattern matching w/ if-let:
`if <half-expr> \n <rest-expr1> then <result1-expr> \n <rest-expr2> then <result-expr2> else <result3-expr>`
-and rest-exprs (or "targets") can have 'is' for pattern-matching, actually so can a full cond-expr
Grammar:
UNIFIED IF EXPRESSIONS FINAL WORK:
basic syntax:
`if_expr := if discriminator '{' (guard_expr)* '}'`
`guard_expr := pattern 'then' block_or_expr'`
`pattern := rhs | is_pattern`
`is_pattern := 'is' ???`
`rhs := expression | ???`
if the only two guard patterns are true and false, then the abbreviated syntax:
`'if' discriminator 'then' block_or_expr 'else' block_or_expr`
can replace `'if' discriminator '{' 'true' 'then' block_or_expr; 'false' 'then' block_or_expr '}'`
conditional := 'if' discriminator
- Next priorities: - get ADTs working, get matches working